For A&R, curators, sync buyers and contests

AI Song Detector

Check whether a song was sung, played or fully generated by AI. The report scores the full mix, the vocal and the instrumental separately, and names the generator it most resembles.

Vocals and instrumental read separately 11 generators scored Free account: 3 checks a day
Detect an AI songFirst check free, no sign-up
1 credit per 5 minutes of audio

How to check a song for AI

Step 1

Upload the song

Use the highest-quality file you have. A WAV or 320 kbps MP3 gives the clearest read.

Step 2

Read the three scores

Full mix, vocals and instrumental. A gap between them usually means AI was used for one part only.

Step 3

Decide what to ask

Use the verdict band to decide whether to accept, ask the artist, or pass — not as an automatic rejection.

Who uses an AI song detector

Different teams, same question: was this recording made by a person?

A&R and labels

Check demos before signing or advancing, and keep the report with the deal file.

Playlist curators

Triage submissions quickly and ask artists about tracks that land in the AI bands.

Sync and licensing

Confirm what you are licensing, especially when a brief excludes AI-generated music.

Contests and grants

Enforce "human-made only" rules consistently across hundreds of entries.

Teachers and schools

Check coursework submissions for fully generated tracks.

Listeners

Curious whether that new artist in your feed is real? Check a song for free.

Vocals, instrumental, or the whole song?

Many songs now mix human and AI parts: a real singer over a generated beat, or an AI voice on a produced track. A single score hides that. Separate stem reads show which part carries the AI signal.

  • Both high — likely fully generated.
  • Vocals high, instrumental low — AI or cloned voice on a human production.
  • Instrumental high, vocals low — human singer on a generated backing track.

AI-generated

The audio carries strong generator fingerprints across the track.

Likely source

Most likely made withSuno
Suno
91.2%
Udio
4.1%
Mureka
2.3%
ElevenLabs
1.1%

Timeline

0:003:04
AI signalMixedHuman signal

Stems

Vocals97.8% AI · Suno
Instrumental88.5% AI · Suno
3:04Sample report

Detection is probabilistic. Use it to route tracks to review, not as the sole basis for takedowns. How to read results

AI song detector FAQ

When the engine returns separate stems, the report shows a vocal read and an instrumental read next to the full-mix score. A human instrumental with AI vocals — or the reverse — shows up as a gap between the two.

The detector looks at how the audio was produced, not at the composition. A new human recording of a song that was first generated with AI should read as human; the original generated recording should read as AI.

Yes. Curators and contest organisers use the score to decide which entries need a closer listen. We recommend asking artists about scores in the "Likely AI" or "Inconclusive" bands rather than rejecting automatically.

It accepts anything from 5 seconds to 15 minutes, but confidence is higher on longer excerpts. For 30-second previews, read "Inconclusive" as "not enough evidence", not as a pass.

Not yet. Upload the audio file. Link checking is on the roadmap; developers can already send any https audio URL through the API.

Three checks a day are free with an account. Creator is $9.90/month for 200 checks. High-volume screening uses API credits billed by audio length.

Related

Reviewing submissions every week?

Creator gives you 200 checks a month with history in your dashboard.